Peer Rejected

rejections > crypto.ZO > REJ:2026.07.11.0001

REJ:2026.07.11.0001crypto.ZO (Cryptozoology)PRJ-2026-0017Vol. 2, No. 7Status: Rejected

Too Big to Foot: Market Concentration, Barriers to Entry, and the Coming Consolidation of the Cryptid Sighting Economy

Hesther R. Lockhart-Buntline1, Marisol E. Okonkwo-Vance2, Douglas F. Peatbog3

1. Institute for Applied Cryptozoology, Drumnadrochit · 2. Center for Attention Economics, Van Meter University · 3. Office of Imaginary Competition Policy, Geneva

Submitted and rejected July 11, 2026 · 9 pages · 6 figures · review duration: 10 minutes

[pdf][share on x]

Abstract

Humanity has catalogued 1,247 distinct monsters, yet seven of them account for of all recorded sightings. Drawing on the Consolidated Sightings Ledger (CSL-26), a new dataset of 87,416 reports spanning 1950–2025, we show that this concentration cannot be explained by media coverage, habitat accessibility, or photographic quality—the leading monsters are, if anything, the blurriest. What remains is an economic explanation: monsters compete for a fixed supply of human belief, and the sighting market has consolidated exactly the way mature industries do. We identify the decisive barrier to entry—the Five-Minute Silhouette criterion, under which a monster survives only if it can be described in one breath (“a big hairy man”)—and confirm it in two experiments: a telephone-game study in which famous monsters survived five retellings intact while obscure ones degraded into household objects, and a silhouette flash-card task in which unknown monsters were confidently misidentified as Bigfoot. By the standards regulators apply to supermarkets, the monster economy is broken: every market segment exceeds the merger-guideline threshold for “highly concentrated,” an unreviewed Bigfoot–Yeti merger is visibly in progress, and our model gives a new monster a chance of ever succeeding again. We conclude with remedies. Chief among them: break up Bigfoot.

keywords: market concentration · Pareto principle · barriers to entry · folklore transmission · cryptid economics · antitrust

Cite this rejection

@article{PRJ20260017,
  title   = {Too Big to Foot: Market Concentration, Barriers to Entry, and the Coming Consolidation of the Cryptid Sighting Economy},
  author  = {Hesther R. Lockhart-Buntline and Marisol E. Okonkwo-Vance and Douglas F. Peatbog},
  journal = {Peer Rejected},
  year    = {2026},
  note    = {Rejected manuscript, PRJ-2026-0017},
  url     = {https://peerrejected.com/papers/too-big-to-foot}
}

Citing this paper is done at your own professional risk.

The paper, in full

[open in new tab]

Your browser can't display the PDF inline.

[download the PDF]