Peer Rejected

rejections > stat.EZ > REJ:2026.08.08.0001

REJ:2026.08.08.0001stat.EZ (Statistics)PRJ-2026-0042Vol. 2, No. 8Status: Rejected

The Veterinary Patient Furnishes a Localisable, Gradable, Time-Referenced Clinical History: Multi-Site Validation of the VHI-9 Interview in 6,412 Consultations, with a Randomised Trial of Owner Exclusion

Nuala Craddock1, Idris Abubakar2, Sanne Riegels3, The PARLOUR-2 Investigators4

1. Fernhurst Veterinary Group, Fernhurst · 2. Fernhurst Veterinary Group, Fernhurst · 3. Department of Clinical Measurement, Wexcombe University · 4. Trial steering committee listed in Appendix A

Submitted and rejected August 8, 2026 · 7 pages · 2 figures · review duration: 5 minutes

[pdf][share on x]

Abstract

Medicine takes the history from the patient. Veterinary medicine takes it from whoever drove. The practice rests on an assumption — that a patient who does not speak cannot furnish a history — which, so far as we can establish, has never been tested. We tested it. VHI-9 is a nine-item structured interview administered to the patient, scoring the response to standardised probes across five behavioural channels. In 6,412 first-opinion consultations at eleven practices, two independent blinded interviewers agreed at Fleiss’ (95% CI 0.81–0.85), with internal consistency and 48-hour test–retest . In the HERALD concordance study (), histories were obtained three ways and compared against a 90-day verified diagnosis adjudicated by a blinded panel. Top-1 concordance was 61.2% for the owner’s account, 84.7% for the patient’s, and 79.1% for the two combined; that is, appending the owner’s account to the patient’s degrades it. Two mechanisms account for the loss. With an owner in the room, 71% of attentional-channel events are directed at the owner rather than at the site of complaint, and owner-reported onset antedates the contemporaneous record by a median 9 days (mean bias days, limits of agreement to ). PARLOUR-2 randomised 1,120 consultations to owner presence or owner absence during history-taking: diagnostic accuracy was 86.1% against 68.4% (risk difference 17.7 percentage points, 95% CI 12.9–22.5, ; number needed to exclude 5.6). The instrument does not work in rabbits, and we do not know why. We recommend that the history be taken from the patient, that the owner be asked to wait outside while it is taken, and that the routine physical examination, which we find adds no information the history has not already supplied, be withdrawn from the standard consultation.

keywords: history-taking · inter-rater reliability · veterinary consultation · informant bias · instrument validation

Cite this rejection

@article{PRJ20260042,
  title   = {The Veterinary Patient Furnishes a Localisable, Gradable, Time-Referenced Clinical History: Multi-Site Validation of the VHI-9 Interview in 6,412 Consultations, with a Randomised Trial of Owner Exclusion},
  author  = {Nuala Craddock and Idris Abubakar and Sanne Riegels and The PARLOUR-2 Investigators},
  journal = {Peer Rejected},
  year    = {2026},
  note    = {Rejected manuscript, PRJ-2026-0042},
  url     = {https://peerrejected.com/papers/the-veterinary-patient-gives-a-history}
}

Citing this paper is done at your own professional risk.

The paper, in full

[open in new tab]

Your browser can't display the PDF inline.

[download the PDF]

More from stat.EZ

REJ:2026.07.23.0001 stat.EZ (Statistics) Rejected

The Phantom Jam Inquest: A Forensic Attribution of Singular Liability in a Provably Authorless Traffic Wave

Wendell A. Fenn

Comments: 16 pages, 8 figures, 0 reproducible results. Rejected in 15 minutes on Jul 23, 2026.

Abstract: The traffic stops for no reason. The road is open — no crash, no merge, no police — and yet the cars halt, clear a minute later, and no one is ever held to account. Physics has a name for this event, the phantom jam or jamiton: a stop-and-go wave that forms on its own once traffic grows dense enough, then rolls backward through the cars for as long as it likes. For forty years the field has filed it under emergent, authorless, no one to blame. We regard that as an open case, not a closed one. Treating each jam as a body owed an inquest, we re-analyse 400 spontaneous jams recorded on an instrumented ring road and, for each, establish a time of death, a manner of death, and a proximate cause. Three findings are reported. First, the jam is clinically dead a mean of 8.4 , mathrm s before any driver perceives a slowdown: death precedes symptom. Second, causal responsibility — each car’s fair share of the total delay — is not diffuse but extreme (fleet Gini =0.93 ): a single vehicle, the index driver, carries a median 71 % of it. Third, the modal manner of death is not natural causes but homicide ( 63 % of jams): an unwarranted leap up the Ladder of Inference, from one ambiguous brake light straight to a full-force stop, with no hazard present. The phantom jam has an author. We name them.

[abs][pdf][bibtex]

REJ:2026.07.15.0001 stat.EZ (Statistics) Rejected

Speak No Evil to My Face: A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Back-Turn Protocol and an Empirical Law Relating Candor to the Solid Angle of Eye Contact

Marguerite S. Aldous, Tobias R. Feldspar & Priya N. Okonkwo

Comments: 4 pages, 8 figures, 0 reproducible results. Rejected in 12 minutes on Jul 15, 2026.

Abstract: Everyone is kinder to your face than they are behind your back. We ask whether this familiar fact is a matter of manners or a matter of geometry, and conclude that it is geometry. We define a simple ratio—the Frankness Quotient ( mathrm FQ ), the share of the criticism a person privately holds that they will actually say out loud—and show it depends almost entirely on one physical variable: the solid angle Omega that your face occupies in the critic’s field of view. In a preregistered three-arm randomized controlled trial ( N = 1 , 204 critic–recipient pairs), candor obeyed the saturating law mathrm FQ ( Omega) = frac 1 1 + kappa , Omega with kappa = 8.0 mathrm sr -1 ( R 2 = 0.94 ). Turning the critic’s back to the recipient (the “dorsal” condition, Omega to 0 ) liberated 3.0 times more criticism than a video call and 2.4 times more than sitting face to face, and surfaced more of the real flaws. Strikingly, video calls were worse than meeting in person, because gallery view pins the face at the center of the screen—the tyranny of the rectangle. We estimate a candor half-angle of theta 1/2 approx 11.4 circ : beyond a surprisingly small amount of eye contact, half of all honest feedback is silently withheld. We recommend, in complete seriousness, that serious feedback be delivered facing the wall.

[abs][pdf][bibtex]